Overdiagnosis

Evidence for overdiagnosis in non-cancer conditions was assessed: a metaepidemiological study using the ‘Fair Umpire’ framework – Sharon Sanders et al.

2023-12-04T12:23:07+11:00Diagnostic system, Overdiagnosis, Publications, Research, Tests|

The objective of this study is to evaluate the strength of the evidence for, and the extent of, overdiagnosis in non-cancer conditions. We systematically searched for studies investigating overdiagnosis in non-cancer conditions. Using the 'Fair Umpire' framework to assess the evidence that cases diagnosed by [...]

Screening for cancer beyond recommended upper age limits: views and experiences of older people – Jenna Smith et al.

2023-12-01T15:18:47+11:00Ageing, Bowel cancer, Breast cancer, Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Overdiagnosis, Prostate cancer, Publications|

Internationally, screening programmes and clinical practice guidelines recommend when older adults should stop cancer screening using upper age limits, but it is unknown how older adults view these recommendations. The obective of this study is to examine older adults’ views and experiences about continuing or [...]

Use of CT, ED presentation and hospitalisations 12 months before and after a diagnosis of cancer in Western Australia: a population-based retrospective cohort study – Ninh Thi Ha et al.

2023-12-01T14:21:39+11:00Cancer, Imaging, Overdiagnosis, Overtesting, Publications, Risk, Screening, Treatment|

The present study examines the patterns of hospital and emergency department services in conjunction with both pre and post diagnostic periods of CT use, which has not been evaluated to date in adult patients with cancer. The cohort makes use of whole of population data [...]

Benefits and harms of prostate specific antigen testing according to Australian guidelines – Michael Caruana et al.

2023-12-01T13:20:42+11:00Cancer, Overdiagnosis, Overtesting, Prostate cancer, Publications, Screening, Tests|

Guidelines for prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing in Australia recommend that men at average risk of prostate cancer who have been informed of the benefits and harms, and who decide to undergo regular testing, should be offered testing every 2 years from 50 to 69 years. This [...]

A call to reconsider the new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus – Katy J.L. Bell, Paul P. Glasziou & Jenny A. Doust

2023-12-01T13:17:17+11:00Diabetes, Diagnostic system, Gestational diabetes, Overdiagnosis, Pregnancy, Publications, Women's health|

We read the article by Nethery and colleagues with great interest, having noted a similar dramatic increase in the incidence of gestational diabetes in Australia, coincident with widespread adoption of the 1-step test using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. [...]

Overdiagnosis and too much medicine in a world of crises – Kühlein et al.

2023-11-01T11:20:56+11:00Overdiagnosis, Overtesting, Overtreatment, Publications, Sustainable health care|

Our global medical culture has driven excessive diagnostic testing, overmedicalisation, and overtreatment across many conditions that may harm patients, exhaust healthcare resources, and harm the planet. The authors call upon local, national, and international decision makers to more prominently and openly acknowledge these issues and [...]

Assessing and Understanding Reactance, Self-Exemption, Disbelief, Source Derogation and Information Conflict in Reaction to Overdiagnosis in Mammography Screening: Scale Development and Preliminary Validation – Laura D. Scherer, Krithika Suresh, Carmen L. Lewis, et al.

2023-10-23T15:12:37+11:00Breast cancer, Overdiagnosis, Publications|

Overdiagnosis is a concept central to making informed breast cancer screening decisions, and yet when provided information about overdiagnosis, some people are skeptical. This research developed a measure that assessed different ways in which people might express skepticism about overdiagnosis (reactance, self-exemption, disbelief, source derogation [...]

Two-year follow-up of participants in the BreastScreen Victoria pilot trial of tomosynthesis versus mammography: breast density-stratified screening outcomes – Nehmat Houssami et al

2023-06-28T16:10:21+10:00Breast cancer, Breast density, Cancer, Imaging, Overdiagnosis, Publications, Screening|

This follow-up study of BreastScreen Victoria’s pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis aimed to report interval cancer rates, screening sensitivity, and density-stratified outcomes for tomosynthesis vs mammography screening.

Screening and diagnostic breast MRI: how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study – Andrea Cozzi et al

2023-06-28T13:24:42+10:00Breast cancer, Cancer, Imaging, Overdiagnosis, Overtreatment, Publications, Screening, Surgery|

Objectives: To report mastectomy and reoperation rates in women who had breast MRI for screening (S-MRI subgroup) or diagnostic (D-MRI subgroup) purposes, using multivariable analysis for investigating the role of MRI referral/nonreferral and other covariates in driving surgical outcomes.

Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review – Rebecca Sims et al

2023-06-27T17:14:41+10:00Cancer, Disease labels, Overdiagnosis, Publications, Screening|

The impacts of screening asymptomatic, non-cancer health conditions are not universally positive. Limited research exists regarding longer-term impacts. Well-designed, high-quality studies further investigating these impacts are required to assist development of protocols that minimise psychological distress following diagnosis.

Go to Top