Research

Evidence for overdiagnosis in noncancer conditions was assessed: a metaepidemiological study using the ‘Fair Umpire’ framework – Sharon Sanders et al.

2024-04-07T15:30:38+10:00Overdiagnosis, Overtesting, Overuse, Publications, Research, Tests|

To our knowledge, this is the first methodological review of studies concerned with overdiagnosis in noncancer conditions. We identified 132 studies identifying or quantifying overdiagnosis of a wide range of noncancer conditions. We applied a novel framework that uses the concept of ‘‘Fair Umpires’’ to [...]

Remotely delivered physiotherapy is as effective as face-to-face physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions (REFORM): a randomised trial – Hannah G Withers et al.

2024-04-07T14:10:21+10:00Musculoskeletal, Physiotherapy, Publications, Randomised Control Trial (RCT), Research, Virtual Care/Telehealth|

The REFORM trial was a randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial in which participants were randomised to either remotely delivered physiotherapy or usual care . The assessor and statisticians were blinded. The protocol was published and the trial was prospectively registered. Participants were recruited from five public [...]

Participant characteristics and reasons for non-consent to health information linkage for research: experiences from the ATHENA COVID-19 study – Kim Greaves et al.

2024-02-13T14:12:53+11:00COVID-19, Ethical considerations, Patient-led surveillance, Primary Care, Publications, Research, Research ethics|

The linkage of primary care, hospital and other health registry data is a global goal, and a consent-based approach is often used. Understanding the attitudes of why participants take part is important, yet little is known about reasons for non-participation. The ATHENA COVID-19 feasibility study [...]

Corporate Influences on Science and Health—the Case of Spinal Cord Stimulation – Adrian C. Traeger & Lisa A. Bero

2024-02-13T13:27:54+11:00Conflicts of interest, Ethical considerations, Musculoskeletal, Pain, Publications, Research ethics, Spinal, Treatment|

Corporations have been developing tactics to undermine independent science for decades. In the 1950s, on learning of the damaging effects of tobacco on health, the tobacco industry used campaigns of criticism to defend their products and the substantial revenue they were generating. Corporations could effectively [...]

Correction: Exploring the Integration of Environmental Impacts in the Cost Analysis of the Pilot MEL-SELF Trial of Patient-Led Melanoma Surveillance – Jake T. W. Williams et al.

2024-02-13T13:25:11+11:00Cancer, Carbon neutral, Correction, Melanoma, Patient-led surveillance, Publications, Sustainable health care|

In this article the Methods section of the Abstract was incorrectly given as “Economic costs were calculated alongside a randomised trial using standard cost analysis methodology from a societal perspective. Environmental impacts were calculated using a type of carbon footprinting methodology called process-based life cycle [...]

Development of the Reporting Infographics and Visual Abstracts of Comparative studies (RIVA-C) checklist and guide – Joshua R. Zadro et al.

2024-02-11T15:17:11+11:00Decision aids, Health literacy, Policy, Public comprehension, Publications, Research|

People often use infographics (also called visual or graphical abstracts) as a substitute for reading the full text of an article. This is a concern because most infographics do not present sufficient information to interpret the research appropriately and guide wise health decisions. The Reporting [...]

Challenges of conducting a randomised placebo-controlled trial of spinal surgery: the SUcceSS trial of lumbar spine decompression – Emma Kwan-Yee Ho et al.

2024-02-11T13:58:00+11:00Musculoskeletal, Placebos, Publications, Research ethics, Risk, Shared decision making, Spinal, Surgery|

Although placebo-controlled trials are considered the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of healthcare interventions, they can be perceived to be controversial and challenging to conduct for surgical treatments. The SUcceSS trial is the first placebo-controlled trial of lumbar decompression surgery for symptomatic lumbar canal [...]

Correction: Reusable versus single-use ICU equipment: what’s the environmental footprint? – Forbes McGain & Scott McAlister

2024-02-11T13:48:52+11:00Carbon footprint, Carbon neutral, Climate change, Correction, Publications, Sustainable health care|

Correction: Intensive Care Medicine https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07256-9 The original article has been corrected. The Authors apologize for the mistake. In the second paragraph of the second page, the first sentence “When using chemical sterilisation, such as ethyleneoxide gas or glutaraldehyde solution for bronchoscopes, reusable equipment will typically always [...]

Go to Top